↓ Skip to main content

Development of RuO2/Rutile-TiO2 Catalyst for Industrial HCl Oxidation Process

Overview of attention for article published in Catalysis Surveys from Asia, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Development of RuO2/Rutile-TiO2 Catalyst for Industrial HCl Oxidation Process
Published in
Catalysis Surveys from Asia, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10563-010-9091-7
Authors

Kohei Seki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 25 34%
Chemical Engineering 10 14%
Materials Science 7 10%
Engineering 4 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,469,522
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Catalysis Surveys from Asia
#17
of 50 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,968
of 95,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Catalysis Surveys from Asia
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.