You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Partnerships with the alcohol industry at the expense of public health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32320-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Petticrew, Martin McKee, Theresa M Marteau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 239 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 100 | 42% |
| Australia | 11 | 5% |
| United States | 10 | 4% |
| Ireland | 6 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Austria | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 81 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 113 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 63 | 26% |
| Scientists | 54 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Psychology | 5 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#287,110
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#3,067
of 42,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,957
of 352,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#79
of 453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.