You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impacts of El Niño Southern Oscillation and Indian Ocean Dipole on dengue incidence in Bangladesh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep16105 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shahera Banu, Yuming Guo, Wenbiao Hu, Pat Dale, John S. Mackenzie, Kerrie Mengersen, Shilu Tong |
| Abstract |
Dengue dynamics are driven by complex interactions between hosts, vectors and viruses that are influenced by environmental and climatic factors. Several studies examined the role of El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) in dengue incidence. However, the role of Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD), a coupled ocean atmosphere phenomenon in the Indian Ocean, which controls the summer monsoon rainfall in the Indian region, remains unexplored. Here, we examined the effects of ENSO and IOD on dengue incidence in Bangladesh. According to the wavelet coherence analysis, there was a very weak association between ENSO, IOD and dengue incidence, but a highly significant coherence between dengue incidence and local climate variables (temperature and rainfall). However, a distributed lag nonlinear model (DLNM) revealed that the association between dengue incidence and ENSO or IOD were comparatively stronger after adjustment for local climate variables, seasonality and trend. The estimated effects were nonlinear for both ENSO and IOD with higher relative risks at higher ENSO and IOD. The weak association between ENSO, IOD and dengue incidence might be driven by the stronger effects of local climate variables such as temperature and rainfall. Further research is required to disentangle these effects. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,881,231
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#24,694
of 123,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,105
of 285,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#536
of 2,768 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,768 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.