| Title |
The Recurring Victimization of Individuals with Mental Illness: A Comparison of Trajectories for Two Racial Groups
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Quantitative Criminology, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10940-015-9271-8 |
| Authors |
Christina Policastro, Brent Teasdale, Leah E. Daigle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 41% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,629,661
of 24,995,564 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#62
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,381
of 400,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.