| Title |
Funding allocation, inequality, and scientific research output: an empirical study based on the life science sector of Natural Science Foundation of China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-015-1773-5 |
| Authors |
Qiang Zhi, Tianguang Meng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 15% |
| Belgium | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Italy | 2 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
| Scientists | 8 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 28% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,532,337
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#531
of 2,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,175
of 392,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.