↓ Skip to main content

A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3223 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health
Published in
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian F. Thayer, Fredrik Åhs, Mats Fredrikson, John J. Sollers, Tor D. Wager

Abstract

The intimate connection between the brain and the heart was enunciated by Claude Bernard over 150 years ago. In our neurovisceral integration model we have tried to build on this pioneering work. In the present paper we further elaborate our model and update it with recent results. Specifically, we performed a meta-analysis of recent neuroimaging studies on the relationship between heart rate variability and regional cerebral blood flow. We identified a number of regions, including the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex, in which significant associations across studies were found. We further propose that the default response to uncertainty is the threat response and may be related to the well known negativity bias. Heart rate variability may provide an index of how strongly 'top-down' appraisals, mediated by cortical-subcortical pathways, shape brainstem activity and autonomic responses in the body. If the default response to uncertainty is the threat response, as we propose here, contextual information represented in 'appraisal' systems may be necessary to overcome this bias during daily life. Thus, HRV may serve as a proxy for 'vertical integration' of the brain mechanisms that guide flexible control over behavior with peripheral physiology, and as such provides an important window into understanding stress and health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 <1%
Germany 13 <1%
Netherlands 7 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Italy 6 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Poland 4 <1%
France 4 <1%
Austria 3 <1%
Other 33 1%
Unknown 3121 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 643 20%
Student > Master 529 16%
Researcher 388 12%
Student > Bachelor 344 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 214 7%
Other 512 16%
Unknown 593 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1014 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 334 10%
Neuroscience 247 8%
Engineering 172 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 138 4%
Other 564 17%
Unknown 754 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,116,678
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#461
of 4,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,515
of 251,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.