↓ Skip to main content

Experiences with the Mass Distribution of LPG Stoves in Rural Communities of Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Experiences with the Mass Distribution of LPG Stoves in Rural Communities of Ghana
Published in
EcoHealth, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10393-018-1369-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martha Ali Abdulai, Samuel Afari-Asiedu, Daniel Carrion, Kenneth Ayuurebobi Ae-Ngibise, Stephaney Gyaase, Mujtaba Mohammed, Oscar Agyei, Ellen Boamah-Kaali, Theresa Tawiah, Rebecca Dwommoh, Francis Agbokey, Seth Owusu-Agyei, Kwaku Poku Asante, Darby Jack

Abstract

Household air pollution (HAP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. To limit HAP exposure and environmental degradation from biomass fuel use, the Government of Ghana promotes liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) use in rural Ghana via the Rural LPG program (RLP). We assessed the experiences of the RLP in 2015, 2 years after its launch. A mixed methods approach was used involving Focus Group Discussions (19) and in-depth interviews (25). In addition, a survey questionnaire was administered to elicit socio-demographic characteristics, household cooking practices and stove use patterns of 200 randomly selected respondents. At about 9 months after LPG acquisition, < 5% of LPG beneficiaries used their stoves. Some of the reasons ascribed to the low usage of the LPG cookstoves were financial constraints, distance to LPG filling point and fear of burns. Community members appreciate the convenience of using LPG. Our results underscore a need for innovative funding mechanisms contextualized within an overall economic empowerment of rural folks to encourage sustained LPG use. It emphasizes the need for innovative accessibility interventions. This could include establishing new LPG filling stations in RLP beneficiary districts to overcome the barriers to sustained LPG use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 25 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 8%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 29 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,686,739
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#474
of 717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,869
of 343,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.