↓ Skip to main content

Universal Design for Learning: meeting the challenge of individual learning differences through a neurocognitive perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Universal Access in the Information Society, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Universal Design for Learning: meeting the challenge of individual learning differences through a neurocognitive perspective
Published in
Universal Access in the Information Society, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10209-006-0062-8
Authors

David H. Rose, Nicole Strangman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 137 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 20%
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Researcher 9 6%
Lecturer 8 6%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 40 28%
Computer Science 13 9%
Design 12 8%
Psychology 9 6%
Arts and Humanities 8 6%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 34 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,123,769
of 24,368,983 outputs
Outputs from Universal Access in the Information Society
#96
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,459
of 163,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Universal Access in the Information Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,368,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them