↓ Skip to main content

Assessing risk in acute chest pain: The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Assessing risk in acute chest pain: The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12350-011-9484-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faisal Nabi, Su Min Chang, Jiaqiong Xu, Elizabeth Gigliotti, John J. Mahmarian

Abstract

To prospectively assess the clinical value of stress-gated myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for triaging patients admitted through the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain (ACP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Unspecified 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,959,162
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#579
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,079
of 247,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.