↓ Skip to main content

The intrathecal, polyspecific antiviral immune response in neurosarcoidosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and autoimmune encephalitis compared to multiple sclerosis in a tertiary hospital…

Overview of attention for article published in Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The intrathecal, polyspecific antiviral immune response in neurosarcoidosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and autoimmune encephalitis compared to multiple sclerosis in a tertiary hospital cohort
Published in
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12987-015-0024-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tilman Hottenrott, Rick Dersch, Benjamin Berger, Sebastian Rauer, Matthias Eckenweiler, Daniela Huzly, Oliver Stich

Abstract

A polyspecific, intrathecal humoral immune response against the neurotropic viruses, measles, rubella and varicella zoster virus, called "MRZ reaction" (MRZR), is present in the majority of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Neurosarcoidosis (NS) and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) are important clinical differential diagnoses of MS. Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) represents a well characterized autoimmune CNS disorder with intrathecal antibody synthesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the specificity of MRZR for MS in patients with NS, ADEM and AIE for the first time, and to compare it with the diagnostic value of oligoclonal bands (OCB). Twenty-two patients with NS, 17 with AIE, 8 with ADEM and 33 with MS serving as controls were analyzed for OCB and MRZR by calculation of the antibody index (AI) for each virus. MRZR was considered as positive if at least two AIs were ≥1.5. A positive MRZR was statistically significantly less frequent in NS (9 %), AIE (11 %) and ADEM (0 %) compared to MS patients (70 %; p < 0.001 each). The specificity of MRZR for MS was 92 % in the study cohort. In comparison to MRZR, the OCB showed a higher sensitivity (100 %), but a lower specificity (69 %) for MS. These results indicate that MRZR seems to be the most specific available CSF marker of MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Neuroscience 8 16%
Psychology 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#6,155,280
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#110
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,410
of 389,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.