You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Water isotope systematics: Improving our palaeoclimate interpretations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quaternary Science Reviews, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.11.014 |
| Authors |
M.D. Jones, S. Dee, L. Anderson, A. Baker, G. Bowen, D.C. Noone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 39% |
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Georgia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 35% |
| Researcher | 14 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 27 | 52% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,269,252
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#960
of 3,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,695
of 399,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#16
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.