↓ Skip to main content

Social cognition in patients with intracranial tumors: do we forget something in the routine neuropsychological examination?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Social cognition in patients with intracranial tumors: do we forget something in the routine neuropsychological examination?
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-3000-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Goebel, H. Maximilian Mehdorn, Christian D. Wiesner

Abstract

Social cognitive functions are of high clinical relevance. To date, little is known about social cognition in neurooncological patients and this domain is usually not included in standardized neurocognitive test batteries. Aim of this study was thus to assess whether social cognition could pose a useful contribution to the neurocognitive assessment in patients with intracranial tumors. We included 30 preoperative patients with a brain tumor. Patients completed a comprehensive test battery for assessment of social cognition. Thirty healthy participants matched for age, gender, and education, served as control group. Clinical relevance of social cognitive deficits was assessed via various self-report measures as well as a clinical rating scale assessing social and occupational functioning. Twenty-five patients (83%) were impaired in at least one measure of social cognition. Whereas patients with lesions to the temporal lobes were most severely impaired, deficits occurred in patients with tumors of a variety of localizations, sizes and malignancies. There was some evidence for missing patients' awareness as well as clinical significance of social cognitive deficits in terms of impaired interactional and occupational functioning. By combination of the Faux-Pas and the Eyes-Test, 77% of patients who were impaired in any social cognitive task were detected. Deficits in social cognition are frequent and clinically relevant in patients with intracranial tumors. The inclusion of social cognitive measures in the routine neuropsychological examination for brain tumor patients might add valuable information about the patient whilst requiring reasonable additional resources.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 22 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 18%
Neuroscience 10 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 26 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,197,289
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#735
of 2,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,226
of 341,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#17
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,994 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.