↓ Skip to main content

Social Simulation Models at the Ethical Crossroads

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Social Simulation Models at the Ethical Crossroads
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11948-017-9993-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pawel Sobkowicz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 17%
Computer Science 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Linguistics 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 6 26%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,057,216
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#680
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,545
of 330,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.