↓ Skip to main content

TCR cross-reactivity and allorecognition: new insights into the immunogenetics of allorecognition

Overview of attention for article published in Immunogenetics, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
TCR cross-reactivity and allorecognition: new insights into the immunogenetics of allorecognition
Published in
Immunogenetics, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00251-011-0590-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. J. D’Orsogna, D. L. Roelen, I. I. N. Doxiadis, F. H. J. Claas

Abstract

Alloreactive T cells are core mediators of graft rejection and are a potent barrier to transplantation tolerance. It was previously unclear how T cells educated in the recipient thymus could recognize allogeneic HLA molecules. Recently it was shown that both naïve and memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are frequently cross-reactive against allogeneic HLA molecules and that this allorecognition exhibits exquisite peptide and HLA specificity and is dependent on both public and private specificities of the T cell receptor. In this review we highlight new insights gained into the immunogenetics of allorecognition, with particular emphasis on how viral infection and vaccination may specifically activate allo-HLA reactive T cells. We also briefly discuss the potential for virus-specific T cell infusions to produce GvHD. The progress made in understanding the molecular basis of allograft rejection will hopefully be translated into improved allograft function and/or survival, and eventually tolerance induction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 93 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Researcher 21 22%
Other 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,633,198
of 24,535,155 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#305
of 1,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,428
of 249,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,535,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,223 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.