You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cascading effects of cyclones on the biodiversity of Southwest Pacific islands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.11.022 |
| Authors |
W. Goulding, P.T. Moss, C.A. McAlpine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 60% |
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 19 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,599,159
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#5,479
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,692
of 399,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#66
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.