↓ Skip to main content

Brief intervention by general practitioners for medication-overuse headache, follow-up after 6 months: a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Brief intervention by general practitioners for medication-overuse headache, follow-up after 6 months: a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Neurology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00415-015-7975-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen, Jørund Straand, Kjersti Grøtta Vetvik, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Michael Bjørn Russell, Christofer Lundqvist

Abstract

Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is a common health problem. Withdrawal of the overused medication is the treatment of choice. We investigated the long-term effectiveness of brief intervention (BI) for MOH patients in primary care. The BI for MOH in primary care study was a blinded, pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial. 25,486 patients (age 18-50) from 50 general practitioners (GPs) were screened for MOH. GPs defined clusters and 23 GPs were randomised to receive BI training and 27 GPs to continue business as usual (BAU). The GPs assessed their MOH patients with the Severity of Dependence Scale, gave individual feedback about the risk of MOH and advice to reduce headache medication. Primary outcomes, assessed 6 months after the intervention, were reduction in headache and medication days/month. 42 % were screening responders. 2.4 % had self-reported MOH. A random selection of 104 patients with self-reported MOH were invited, 75 were randomised out of which 60 with a physician-defined MOH diagnosis were included. None were lost to follow-up. BI was significantly better than BAU regarding primary outcomes (p < 0.001-0.018). Headache and medication days were reduced by 5.9 (95 % CI 1.1-10.8) and 6.2 (1.1-11.3) more days/month in BI than BAU group. Chronic headache resolved in 63 and 11 % in the BI and the BAU group (p < 0.001). Headache-related disability was lower among those who detoxified. In conclusion, BI is an effective treatment in primary care with lasting effect 6 months after the intervention for MOH. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01314768.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,804,154
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#918
of 4,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,836
of 391,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#14
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.