You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Combination of label-free quantitative proteomics and transcriptomics reveals intraspecific venom variation between the two strains of Tetrastichus brontispae, a parasitoid of two invasive beetles
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Proteomics, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.08.003 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bao-Zhen Tang, E Meng, Hua-Jian Zhang, Xiao-Mei Zhang, Sassan Asgari, Ya-Ping Lin, Yun-Ying Lin, Zheng-Qiang Peng, Ting Qiao, Xia-Fang Zhang, You-Ming Hou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 26% |
Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 35% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2020.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Proteomics
#2,625
of 3,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,898
of 341,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Proteomics
#41
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,461 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.