↓ Skip to main content

Variability and structure of natural populations of Elymus caninus (L.) L. based on morphology

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics and Evolution, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Variability and structure of natural populations of Elymus caninus (L.) L. based on morphology
Published in
Plant Systematics and Evolution, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00606-004-0262-8
Authors

M. Mizianty

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 67%
Computer Science 1 17%
Environmental Science 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#146
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,383
of 60,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them