↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Fat and Risk for Type 2 Diabetes: a Review of Recent Research

Overview of attention for article published in Current Nutrition Reports, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 375)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
Dietary Fat and Risk for Type 2 Diabetes: a Review of Recent Research
Published in
Current Nutrition Reports, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13668-018-0244-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beth H. Rice Bradley

Abstract

It is estimated that over 400 million people worldwide are living with diabetes. Excess adiposity is the strongest risk factor for non-insulin-dependent diabetes, type 2. Lifestyle interventions have demonstrated that diet plays a critical role in preventing the onset of type 2 diabetes. Dietary fat is not only a source of energy and nutrients, but also bioactive fatty acids. The purpose of this review was to examine data from recent prospective cohort studies and dietary interventions to determine if there are benefits to fat consumption on diabetes risk. The consumption of fish and marine n-3 fatty acids among Asian populations and regular-fat dairy foods and trans-palmitoleic acid (trans-16, n-7) among Western populations may be associated with reduced risk for type 2 diabetes. Whereas some dietary fat may contribute to reduced diabetes risk, lifestyle recommendations to balance calories with physical activity are prudent at this time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Researcher 13 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 98 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 105 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#927,261
of 25,099,766 outputs
Outputs from Current Nutrition Reports
#47
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,958
of 347,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Nutrition Reports
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,099,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.