↓ Skip to main content

Performance of eDNA assays to detect and quantify an elusive benthic fish in upland streams

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Performance of eDNA assays to detect and quantify an elusive benthic fish in upland streams
Published in
Biological Invasions, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10530-018-1760-x
Authors

Rheyda Hinlo, Mark Lintermans, Dianne Gleeson, Ben Broadhurst, Elise Furlan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 33%
Environmental Science 18 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Unspecified 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,109,676
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,531
of 2,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,823
of 330,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#34
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.