↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of the Detrimental Impact of Polyvalent Streptophages Intended to be Used as Biological Control Agents on Beneficial Soil Streptoflora

Overview of attention for article published in Current Microbiology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of the Detrimental Impact of Polyvalent Streptophages Intended to be Used as Biological Control Agents on Beneficial Soil Streptoflora
Published in
Current Microbiology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00284-018-1565-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina R. Ashfield-Crook, Zachary Woodward, Martin Soust, D. İpek Kurtböke

Abstract

Streptophages are currently being investigated to control potato common scab, however, since a majority of streptophages are reported to be polyvalent, their potential to infect beneficial soil streptomycetes during the application process may have unintended consequences. To test this hypothesis, two phytopathogenic fungi, namely Fusarium solani and Rhizoctonia solani, were tested for their detrimental effect on the test crop wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Gutha). F. solani caused a significant root weight reduction (34%) in the wheat plant and therefore was tested further in the pot trials with actinomycetes present. Sixty-seven streptomycete isolates from a Tasmanian potato farm were screened for their antifungal abilities against the two phytopathogenic fungi. Four actinomycetes found to be strongly antifungal were then tested for their disease-protective abilities against F. solani in pot trials again using wheat. Addition of the streptomycetes into the container media protected the plants against F. solani, indicating that streptomycetes have a disease-suppressive effect. A further pot trial was conducted to evaluate whether these beneficial streptomycete species would be affected by streptophage treatment and subsequently result in an increased risk of fungal infections. When streptophages were added to the pots, the shoot and root growth of wheat declined by 23.6% and 8.0%, respectively, in the pots with the pathogenic fungus compared to the control pots. These differences might suggest that removal of antifungal streptomycetes by polyvalent phages from plant rhizosphere when biocontrol of plant pathogenic streptomycetes (e.g. Streptomyces scabiei) is targeted might encourage secondary fungal infections in the farm environment. The presented data provide preliminary evidence that streptophage treatment of pathogenic streptomycetes may lead to an aggravated disease risk by soil-borne fungal pathogens when naturally present antagonists are removed. As a result, extensive farm site trials are required to determine the long-term detrimental impact of polyvalent streptophage treatments on beneficial soil streptoflora.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 18%
Unspecified 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,155,860
of 24,775,802 outputs
Outputs from Current Microbiology
#1,832
of 2,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,559
of 346,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Microbiology
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,775,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,613 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.