↓ Skip to main content

Adverse drug events associated with 5mg versus 10mg Tofacitinib (Janus kinase inhibitor) twice daily for the treatment of autoimmune diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized…

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Adverse drug events associated with 5mg versus 10mg Tofacitinib (Janus kinase inhibitor) twice daily for the treatment of autoimmune diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10067-018-4299-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng Huang, Zu-chun Luo

Abstract

Several recently published clinical trials have shown tofacitinib to be effective in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. This drug is commonly prescribed either in a 5-mg or in a10-mg dosage twice daily. In this review, we aimed to systematically compare the adverse drug events which were observed with 5 mg versus 10 mg tofacitinib for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and www.ClinicalTrials.gov were searched (from March to April 2018) for suitable English publications (published before April 2018). The inclusion criteria were as follows: randomized controlled trials, autoimmune disorders (rheumatic arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, moderate to severe psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis), and comparison of adverse drug events associated with 5 mg versus 10 mg tofacitinib. This study had follow-up time periods of 3 months and ≥ 6 months. Statistical analysis was carried out by RevMan 5.3 whereby risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated. A total number of 4287 participants were included (2144 versus 2143 participants who received 5 mg and 10 mg tofacitinib twice daily respectively). The results showed that at 3 months, similar risks of adverse drug events, serious adverse events, and adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were observed with 5 mg versus 10 mg tofacitinib (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.98-1.10; P = 0.17, I2 = 0%; RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.48; P = 0.71, I2 = 0%; and RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.78-1.43; P = 0.73, I2 = 32%, respectively). The other outcomes including serious infection events, adjudicated herpes zoster infection, adjudicated opportunistic infection, mild and severe neutropenia, malignancies, and adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events were also similarly manifested. However, a decreased level of hemoglobin significantly favored 5 mg tofacitinib (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.19-2.58; P = 0.005, I2 = 49%). Even at a follow-up time period of ≥ 6 months, adverse drug events, serious adverse events, adverse drug events leading to drug discontinuation, and serious infection were still similarly observed. According to this current review, both dosages of tofacitinib were safe to use. Even if similar adverse drug events were observed with 5 mg versus 10 mg tofacitinib twice daily for the treatment of autoimmune disorders, anemia was more prominent with 10 mg tofacitinib at a 3 month follow-up. Nevertheless, future studies based on a larger population size with longer follow-up time periods should further be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Unspecified 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 14%
Unspecified 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,019,263
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#1,942
of 3,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,776
of 340,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#33
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.