↓ Skip to main content

A suprachiasmatic-independent circadian clock(s) in the habenula is affected by Per gene mutations and housing light conditions in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
A suprachiasmatic-independent circadian clock(s) in the habenula is affected by Per gene mutations and housing light conditions in mice
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00429-018-1756-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nora L. Salaberry, Hélène Hamm, Marie-Paule Felder-Schmittbuhl, Jorge Mendoza

Abstract

For many years, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) was considered as the unique circadian pacemaker in the mammalian brain. Currently, it is known that other brain areas are able to oscillate in a circadian manner. However, many of them are dependent on, or synchronized by, the SCN. The Habenula (Hb), localized in the epithalamus, is a key nucleus for the regulation of monoamine activity (dopamine, serotonin) and presents circadian features; nonetheless, the clock properties of the Hb are not fully described. Here, we report, first, circadian expression of clock genes in the lateral habenula (LHb) under constant darkness (DD) condition in wild-type mice which is disturbed in double Per1-/--Per2Brdm1 clock-mutant mice. Second, using Per2::luciferase transgenic mice, we observed a self-sustained oscillatory ability (PER2::LUCIFERASE bioluminescence rhythmicity) in the rostral and caudal part of the Hb of arrhythmic SCN-ablated animals. Finally, in Per2::luciferase mice exposed to different lighting conditions (light-dark, constant darkness or constant light), the period or amplitude of PER2 oscillations, in both the rostral and caudal Hb, were similar. However, under DD condition or from SCN-lesioned mice, these two Hb regions were out of phase, suggesting an uncoupling of two putative Hb oscillators. Altogether, these results suggest that an autonomous clock in the rostral and caudal part of the Hb requires integrity of circadian genes to tick, and light information or SCN innervation to keep synchrony. The relevance of the Hb timing might reside in the regulation of circadian functions linked to motivational (reward) and emotional (mood) processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2018.
All research outputs
#21,697,638
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#1,524
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,138
of 345,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#41
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.