↓ Skip to main content

Forecasting model of Corylus, Alnus, and Betula pollen concentration levels using spatiotemporal correlation properties of pollen count

Overview of attention for article published in Aerobiologia, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Forecasting model of Corylus, Alnus, and Betula pollen concentration levels using spatiotemporal correlation properties of pollen count
Published in
Aerobiologia, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10453-015-9418-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakub Nowosad, Alfred Stach, Idalia Kasprzyk, Elżbieta Weryszko-Chmielewska, Krystyna Piotrowska-Weryszko, Małgorzata Puc, Łukasz Grewling, Anna Pędziszewska, Agnieszka Uruska, Dorota Myszkowska, Kazimiera Chłopek, Barbara Majkowska-Wojciechowska

Abstract

The aim of the study was to create and evaluate models for predicting high levels of daily pollen concentration of Corylus, Alnus, and Betula using a spatiotemporal correlation of pollen count. For each taxon, a high pollen count level was established according to the first allergy symptoms during exposure. The dataset was divided into a training set and a test set, using a stratified random split. For each taxon and city, the model was built using a random forest method. Corylus models performed poorly. However, the study revealed the possibility of predicting with substantial accuracy the occurrence of days with high pollen concentrations of Alnus and Betula using past pollen count data from monitoring sites. These results can be used for building (1) simpler models, which require data only from aerobiological monitoring sites, and (2) combined meteorological and aerobiological models for predicting high levels of pollen concentration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 4%
Estonia 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Computer Science 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,351,847
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Aerobiologia
#170
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,713
of 389,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aerobiologia
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.