↓ Skip to main content

Potential applications of insect symbionts in biotechnology

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
Title
Potential applications of insect symbionts in biotechnology
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00253-015-7186-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aileen Berasategui, Shantanu Shukla, Hassan Salem, Martin Kaltenpoth

Abstract

Symbiotic interactions between insects and microorganisms are widespread in nature and are often the source of ecological innovations. In addition to supplementing their host with essential nutrients, microbial symbionts can produce enzymes that help degrade their food source as well as small molecules that defend against pathogens, parasites, and predators. As such, the study of insect ecology and symbiosis represents an important source of chemical compounds and enzymes with potential biotechnological value. In addition, the knowledge on insect symbiosis can provide novel avenues for the control of agricultural pest insects and vectors of human diseases, through targeted manipulation of the symbionts or the host-symbiont associations. Here, we discuss different insect-microbe interactions that can be exploited for insect pest and human disease control, as well as in human medicine and industrial processes. Our aim is to raise awareness that insect symbionts can be interesting sources of biotechnological applications and that knowledge on insect ecology can guide targeted efforts to discover microorganisms of applied value.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 320 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 16%
Student > Master 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 8%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 64 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 134 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 18%
Environmental Science 14 4%
Chemistry 7 2%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 73 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,886,325
of 25,408,670 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,414
of 8,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,176
of 396,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#25
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,408,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.