| Title |
Validation of cardiac magnetic-resonance-derived left ventricular strain measurements from free-breathing motion-corrected cine imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Radiology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00247-018-4251-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony Merlocco, Russell R. Cross, Peter Kellman, Hui Xue, Laura Olivieri |
| Abstract |
Myocardial strain is an important measure of cardiac function and can be assessed on cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) through the current gold standard of breath-held segmented steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine imaging. Novel free-breathing techniques have been validated for volumetry and systolic function, allowing for evaluation of sicker and younger children who cannot reliably hold their breath. It is unclear whether strain measurements can be reliably performed on free-breathing, motion-corrected, re-binning cine images. To compare strain analysis from motion-corrected retrospective re-binning images to the breath-held SSFP cine images to explore their validity. Twenty-five children and young adults, ages (2.1-18.6 years) underwent breath-held and motion-corrected retrospective re-binning cine techniques during the same MR examination on a 1.5-tesla magnet. We measured endocardial end-systolic global circumferential strain and endocardial averaged segmental strain using commercial software (MEDIS QStrain 2.1). We used Pearson correlation coefficients to test agreement across techniques. Analysis was possible in all 25 breath-held and motion-corrected retrospective re-binning studies. Global circumferential strain and endocardial averaged segmental strain obtained by motion-corrected retrospective re-binning compared favorably to breath-held studies. Global circumferential strain linear regression models demonstrated acceptable agreement, with coefficients of determination of 0.75 for breath-held compared to motion-corrected retrospective re-binning (P<0.001) and for endocardial averaged segmental strain comparisons yielded 0.77 for breath-held vs. motion-corrected retrospective re-binning (P<0.001). Bland-Altman assessment demonstrated minimal bias for breath-held compared to motion-corrected retrospective re-binning (mean 2.4 and 1.9, respectively, for global circumferential strain and endocardial averaged segmental strain). Free-breathing imaging by motion-corrected retrospective re-binning cine imaging provides adequate spatial and temporal resolution to measure myocardial deformation when compared to the gold-standard breath-held SSFP cine imaging in children with normal or borderline systolic function. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 18% |
| Engineering | 2 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2018.
All research outputs
#16,632,167
of 24,468,058 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#1,392
of 2,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,780
of 345,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#35
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,468,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,176 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.