↓ Skip to main content

Echocardiographic surrogates of right atrial pressure in pulmonary hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Heart and Vessels, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Echocardiographic surrogates of right atrial pressure in pulmonary hypertension
Published in
Heart and Vessels, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00380-018-1264-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryo Watanabe, Hirohisa Amano, Fumiya Saito, Shigeru Toyoda, Masashi Sakuma, Shichiro Abe, Toshiaki Nakajima, Teruo Inoue

Abstract

Right atrial pressure (RAP), a representative parameter of right heart failure, is very important for prognostic evaluation and risk assessment in pulmonary hypertension. However, its measurement requires invasive cardiac catheterization. In this study, we determined the most accurate echocardiographic surrogate of catheterization-based RAP. In 23 patients with pulmonary hypertension, a total of 66 cardiac catheterization procedures were performed along with 2-dimensional echocardiography. We evaluated tricuspid E/A, E', A' and E/E', and estimated RAP by the respirophasic variation of the inferior vena cava diameter (eRAP-IVCd) as possible surrogates of catheterization-based RAP. In simple linear regression analysis, E/A (R = 0.452, P = 0.0001) and eRAP-IVCd (R = 0.505, P < 0.0001) were positively correlated with catheterization-based RAP, whereas A' (R = - 0.512, P < 0.0001) was negatively correlated with RAP. In multiple regression analysis, A' was the most significant independent predictor of catheterization-based RAP (R = - 0.375, P = 0.0007). In 16 patients who had multiple measurements, there were a total of 43 measurements before and after medication changes. The absolute change in catheterization-based RAP was negatively correlated with the percent change in A'. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the optimal cut-off value of A' to predict a catheterization-based RAP > 10 mmHg was 11.3 cm/s (area under the curve = 0.782, sensitivity = 0.70, specificity = 0.78). In 20 measurements of 20 patients with left heart failure, catheterization-based RAP was not correlated with any of 5 echocardiographic parameters. However, it was closely correlated with catheterization-based pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. The echocardiographic parameter, A', was the best surrogate of catheterization-based RAP in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Unknown 8 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Unknown 9 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2018.
All research outputs
#21,162,249
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Heart and Vessels
#516
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,507
of 342,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart and Vessels
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.