↓ Skip to main content

Counselling practices in community pharmacies in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Counselling practices in community pharmacies in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12913-015-1220-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sinaa Alaqeel, Norah O. Abanmy

Abstract

Community pharmacists play a crucial role in optimising medication use and improving patient outcomes, whilst preventing medication misuse and reducing costs. Evidence suggests that pharmacists counselling improves clinical outcomes, quality of life, drug and disease knowledge and reduces health service utilisation. This study aims to investigate the counselling practices of community pharmacists in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia. The study consisted of two parts: simulated patients (SPs) visits to observe actual counselling practices, and a cross-sectional survey of community pharmacists to assess their reported counselling practices. In the SPs method, there were four scenarios involving four medications. Scenarios 1 and 2 concerned drug-drug interactions, scenario 3 concerned the proper time of administration, and scenario 4 concerned side effects. The simulated visits were conducted between April and May 2012. A four-sections questionnaire was distributed in the same period. We conducted 161 simulated visits. Out of the 161 visits a medicine was dispensed in 150 visits. When SPs requested medications, pharmacists asked questions during 15 visits (10.0 %), provided information during 7 visits (4.6 %), and both asked questions and provided information, i.e. provided counselling, during 4 visits (2.6 %). When the SPs started to be inquisitive and demanded information, pharmacists asked SPs questions during 71 visits (47.3 %), provided information during 150 visits (100 %), and both asked questions and provided information, i.e. provided counselling, during 65 visits (43.3 %). Information regarding dose was the most common type of information provided in 146 visits (97.3 %). After the SPs started to be inquisitive and probed for information, only 10 % were counselled on precautions. In the cross-sectional survey, four hundred pharmacists were approached and 350 agreed to participate in the questionnaire (87 % response rate). Of the respondents, 223 (63.7 %) reported that they usually or always tell the patient about the purpose of medicines or the diagnosis, 302 (86.2 %) reported that they usually or always give patient information on how to use or apply the medicine; 299 (85.3 %) said they were satisfied with their counselling practices. The present study highlights the current deficiencies in appropriate dispensing practices and medication counselling at community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia. Policy makers, stakeholders, and researchers should collaborate to design interventions to improve the current dispensing practices at community pharmacies across the country.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 143 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 54 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 47 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 59 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,351,847
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,563
of 7,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,893
of 390,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#74
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.