| Title |
Lab Ref. A Handbook of Recipes, Reagents, and Other Reference Tools for Use at the Bench (Roskams, J., and Rodgers, L. (eds.), Humana Press, Humana, 2002, 272 p., $35)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biochemistry, May 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10541-005-0156-6 |
| Authors |
G. Ya. Wiederschain |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#7,405
of 22,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,543
of 70,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#37
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.