| Title |
Appraising cross-national income inequality databases: An introduction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Economic Inequality, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10888-015-9316-0 |
| Authors |
Francisco H. G. Ferreira, Nora Lustig, Daniel Teles |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 24% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 34 | 45% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,919,750
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Economic Inequality
#31
of 317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,118
of 394,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Economic Inequality
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them