↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of five methods in landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study from the 330-kV transmission line in Gansu Region, China

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Earth Sciences, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of five methods in landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study from the 330-kV transmission line in Gansu Region, China
Published in
Environmental Earth Sciences, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12665-018-7814-7
Authors

Yunfeng Ge, Hongzhi Chen, Binbin Zhao, Huiming Tang, Zishan Lin, Zhiguo Xie, Le Lv, Peng Zhong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 17%
Engineering 5 17%
Computer Science 4 13%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,890,949
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Earth Sciences
#419
of 1,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,012
of 340,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Earth Sciences
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,784 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.