| Title |
Night shifts, human factors, and errors in the ICU: a causal pathway?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-015-4170-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. Rubulotta, D. C. Scales, S. D. Halpern |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#5,132
of 5,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337,648
of 395,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#49
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.