You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MAVS deficiency induces gut dysbiotic microbiota conferring a proallergic phenotype
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1722372115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emilie Plantamura, Amiran Dzutsev, Mathias Chamaillard, Sophia Djebali, Lyvia Moudombi, Lilia Boucinha, Morgan Grau, Claire Macari, David Bauché, Oana Dumitrescu, Jean-Philippe Rasigade, Saskia Lippens, Michelina Plateroti, Elsa Kress, Annabelle Cesaro, Clovis Bondu, Ulrike Rothermel, Mathias Heikenwälder, Gerard Lina, Azzak Bentaher-Belaaouaj, Julien C. Marie, Christophe Caux, Giorgio Trinchieri, Jacqueline Marvel, Marie-Cecile Michallet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 22 | 51% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 79% |
| Scientists | 8 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Researcher | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 78% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 26 | 81% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#430,576
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7,663
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,072
of 353,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#150
of 960 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 960 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.