↓ Skip to main content

Holocene shifts in the assembly of plant and animal communities implicate human impacts

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
twitter
138 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
17 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
518 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Holocene shifts in the assembly of plant and animal communities implicate human impacts
Published in
Nature, December 2015
DOI 10.1038/nature16447
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Kathleen Lyons, Kathryn L. Amatangelo, Anna K. Behrensmeyer, Antoine Bercovici, Jessica L. Blois, Matt Davis, William A. DiMichele, Andrew Du, Jussi T. Eronen, J. Tyler Faith, Gary R. Graves, Nathan Jud, Conrad Labandeira, Cindy V. Looy, Brian McGill, Joshua H. Miller, David Patterson, Silvia Pineda-Munoz, Richard Potts, Brett Riddle, Rebecca Terry, Anikó Tóth, Werner Ulrich, Amelia Villaseñor, Scott Wing, Heidi Anderson, John Anderson, Donald Waller, Nicholas J. Gotelli

Abstract

Understanding how ecological communities are organized and how they change through time is critical to predicting the effects of climate change. Recent work documenting the co-occurrence structure of modern communities found that most significant species pairs co-occur less frequently than would be expected by chance. However, little is known about how co-occurrence structure changes through time. Here we evaluate changes in plant and animal community organization over geological time by quantifying the co-occurrence structure of 359,896 unique taxon pairs in 80 assemblages spanning the past 300 million years. Co-occurrences of most taxon pairs were statistically random, but a significant fraction were spatially aggregated or segregated. Aggregated pairs dominated from the Carboniferous period (307 million years ago) to the early Holocene epoch (11,700 years before present), when there was a pronounced shift to more segregated pairs, a trend that continues in modern assemblages. The shift began during the Holocene and coincided with increasing human population size and the spread of agriculture in North America. Before the shift, an average of 64% of significant pairs were aggregated; after the shift, the average dropped to 37%. The organization of modern and late Holocene plant and animal assemblages differs fundamentally from that of assemblages over the past 300 million years that predate the large-scale impacts of humans. Our results suggest that the rules governing the assembly of communities have recently been changed by human activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 518 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 484 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 129 25%
Researcher 109 21%
Student > Master 59 11%
Professor 32 6%
Student > Bachelor 29 6%
Other 98 19%
Unknown 62 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 212 41%
Environmental Science 102 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 61 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Social Sciences 12 2%
Other 34 7%
Unknown 84 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 318. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#108,791
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#7,396
of 98,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,575
of 398,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#145
of 990 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 990 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.