Title |
Do bad borrowers hurt good borrowers? A model of biased banking competition
|
---|---|
Published in |
Portuguese Economic Journal, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10258-018-0149-1 |
Authors |
David Peón, Manel Antelo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Librarian | 1 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 50% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2020.
All research outputs
#17,990,409
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Portuguese Economic Journal
#73
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,878
of 340,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Portuguese Economic Journal
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.