Title |
Peer review fraud—it's not big and it's not clever
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10545-015-9905-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shamima Rahman, Matthias R. Baumgartner, Eva Morava, Marc Patterson, Verena Peters, Johannes Zschocke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 3 | 60% |
Other | 1 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 80% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,634,579
of 24,764,450 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#1,477
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,708
of 400,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,764,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.