↓ Skip to main content

Driving Simulator Performance in Novice Drivers with Autism Spectrum Disorder: The Role of Executive Functions and Basic Motor Skills

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
Title
Driving Simulator Performance in Novice Drivers with Autism Spectrum Disorder: The Role of Executive Functions and Basic Motor Skills
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2677-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephany M. Cox, Daniel J. Cox, Michael J. Kofler, Matthew A. Moncrief, Ronald J. Johnson, Ann E. Lambert, Sarah A. Cain, Ronald E. Reeve

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate poorer driving performance than their peers and are less likely to obtain a driver's license. This study aims to examine the relationship between driving performance and executive functioning for novice drivers, with and without ASD, using a driving simulator. Forty-four males (ages 15-23), 17 with ASD and 27 healthy controls, completed paradigms assessing driving skills and executive functioning. ASD drivers demonstrated poorer driving performance overall and the addition of a working memory task resulted in a significant decrement in their performance relative to control drivers. Results suggest that working memory may be a key mechanism underlying difficulties demonstrated by ASD drivers and provides insight for future intervention programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 179 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Engineering 13 7%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,792,391
of 24,375,780 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,800
of 5,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,743
of 399,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#47
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,375,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.