↓ Skip to main content

Clinical assessment of social cognitive function in neurological disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neurology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
345 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
635 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical assessment of social cognitive function in neurological disorders
Published in
Nature Reviews Neurology, December 2015
DOI 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie D. Henry, William von Hippel, Pascal Molenberghs, Teresa Lee, Perminder S. Sachdev

Abstract

Social cognition broadly refers to the processing of social information in the brain that underlies abilities such as the detection of others' emotions and responding appropriately to these emotions. Social cognitive skills are critical for successful communication and, consequently, mental health and wellbeing. Disturbances of social cognition are early and salient features of many neuropsychiatric, neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders, and often occur after acute brain injury. Its assessment in the clinic is, therefore, of paramount importance. Indeed, the most recent edition of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-5) introduced social cognition as one of six core components of neurocognitive function, alongside memory and executive control. Failures of social cognition most often present as poor theory of mind, reduced affective empathy, impaired social perception or abnormal social behaviour. Standard neuropsychological assessments lack the precision and sensitivity needed to adequately inform treatment of these failures. In this Review, we present appropriate methods of assessment for each of the four domains, using an example disorder to illustrate the value of these approaches. We discuss the clinical applications of testing for social cognitive function, and finally suggest a five-step algorithm for the evaluation and treatment of impairments, providing quantitative evidence to guide the selection of social cognitive measures in clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 635 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 626 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 15%
Student > Master 83 13%
Student > Bachelor 80 13%
Researcher 72 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 8%
Other 96 15%
Unknown 159 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 193 30%
Neuroscience 88 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 78 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 2%
Other 67 11%
Unknown 183 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,143,256
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neurology
#244
of 2,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,967
of 398,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neurology
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.