↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac metabolomics and autopsy in a patient with early diffuse systemic sclerosis presenting with dyspnea: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Cardiac metabolomics and autopsy in a patient with early diffuse systemic sclerosis presenting with dyspnea: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13256-015-0587-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracy M Frech, Monica P Revelo, John J Ryan, Ami A Shah, Jessica Gordon, Robyn Domsic, Faye Hant, Shervin Assassi, Victoria K Shanmugam, Monique Hinchcliff, Virginia Steen, Dinesh Khanna, Elana J Bernstein, James Cox, Nick Luem, Stavros Drakos

Abstract

Diffuse systemic sclerosis is associated with high mortality; however, the pathogenesis of cardiac death in these patients is not clear. A 56-year-old Caucasian female patient presented with dyspnea and requested to donate her body to science in order to improve understanding of diffuse systemic sclerosis pathogenesis. She had extensive testing for dyspnea including pulmonary function tests, an echocardiogram, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and right heart catheterization to characterize her condition. Her case highlights the morbidity seen in this disease, including the presence of extensive skin thickening, digital ulcerations, and scleroderma renal crisis. In this case report, we present the finding of cardiac tissue metabolomics, which may indicate a problem with vasodilation as a contributor to cardiac death in diffuse systemic sclerosis. The use of autopsy and tissue metabolomics in rare disease may help clarify disease pathogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Other 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,698,371
of 23,327,904 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#1,551
of 4,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,184
of 267,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#14
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,327,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.