↓ Skip to main content

Resistance Mechanism in a Terbinafine-Resistant Strain of Microsporum canis

Overview of attention for article published in Mycopathologia, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Resistance Mechanism in a Terbinafine-Resistant Strain of Microsporum canis
Published in
Mycopathologia, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11046-018-0242-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Kano, Yun-Hsia Hsiao, Hock Siew Han, Charles Chen, Atsuhiko Hasegawa, Hiroshi Kamata

Abstract

To clarify the terbinafine (TRF) resistance mechanism in a TRF-resistant strain of Microsporum canis, the expression of the pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR1), multidrug resistance (MDR1), MDR2 and MDR4 genes were investigated by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis, given the known interaction of the corresponding proteins with antifungals and with the efflux blocker FK506. The expression of the PDR1, MDR1, MDR2 and MDR4 genes was 2-4 times higher in the TRF-resistant strain grown in the presence of 0.14 µg/mL of TRF than in TRF-susceptible strains cultured in the absence of TRF. The TRF-resistant strain exhibited MICs of > 32 µg/mL for TRF alone; this resistance was attenuated to an MIC of 8 µg/mL in the presence of FK506, indicating that the TRF inhibitory concentration index value was < 0.75. The additive effect of the efflux blocker FK506 on TRF resistance was detected in the TRF-resistant strain. These results indicated that the TRF resistance in this strain reflects overexpression of genes encoding ABC transporter proteins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 12 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 6 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,649,666
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Mycopathologia
#784
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,333
of 442,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycopathologia
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.