↓ Skip to main content

A non-linear congruential pseudo random number generator

Overview of attention for article published in Statistical Papers, December 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 189)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
A non-linear congruential pseudo random number generator
Published in
Statistical Papers, December 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02932576
Authors

Jürgen Eichenauer, Jürgen Lehn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 22%
Mathematics 2 22%
Physics and Astronomy 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Statistical Papers
#19
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,507
of 44,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistical Papers
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them