You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
One- and two-year follow-up of a randomized trial of neck-specific exercise with or without a behavioural approach compared with prescription of physical activity in chronic whiplash disorder.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2340/16501977-2041 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Landén Ludvigsson, Gunnel Peterson, Åsa Dedering, Anneli Peolsson |
| Abstract |
To explore whether neck-specific exercise, with or without a behavioural approach, has benefits after 1 and 2 years compared with prescribed physical activity regarding pain, self-rated functioning/disability, and self-efficacy in management of chronic whiplash. Follow-up of a randomized, assessor blinded, clinical trial. A total of 216 volunteers with chronic whiplash-associated disorders, grades 2 or 3. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 exercise interventions: neck-specific exercise with or without a behavioural approach, or physical activity prescription. Self-rated pain (visual analogue scale), disability/functioning (Neck Disability Index/Patient Specific Functional Scale) and self-efficacy (Self-Efficacy Scale) were evaluated after 1 and 2 years. Both neck-specific exercise groups maintained more improvement regarding disability/functioning than the prescribed physical < 0.001), but at 2 years the difference was not significant. After 1-2 years, participants with chronic whiplash who were randomized to neck-specific exercise, with or without a behavioural approach, remained more improved than participants who were prescribed general physical activity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 16% |
| Sweden | 4 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 82% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 23% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 56 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,308,768
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#28
of 1,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,169
of 400,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#4
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.