| Title |
A web-based intervention (RESTORE) to support self-management of cancer-related fatigue following primary cancer treatment: a multi-centre proof of concept randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-015-3044-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Foster, Chloe Grimmett, Christine M. May, Sean Ewings, Michelle Myall, Claire Hulme, Peter W. Smith, Cassandra Powers, Lynn Calman, Jo Armes, Matthew Breckons, Jessica Corner, Deborah Fenlon, Lynn Batehup, Elaine Lennan, Carl R. May, Carolyn Morris, Amanda Neylon, Emma Ream, Lesley Turner, Lucy Yardley, Alison Richardson |
| Abstract |
Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a frequent and distressing symptom experienced after cancer treatment. RESTORE is the first web-based resource designed to enhance self-efficacy to manage CRF following curative-intent treatment. The aim of this study is to test the proof of concept and inform the design of an effectiveness trial. A multi-centre parallel-group two-armed (1:1) exploratory randomised controlled trial (RCT) with qualitative process evaluation was employed in the study. Participants (≥18 years; ≤5 years post treatment with moderate to severe fatigue) were recruited and randomly assigned to RESTORE or a leaflet. Feasibility and acceptability were measured by recruitment, attrition, intervention adherence, completion of outcome measures and process evaluation. Change in self-efficacy to manage CRF was also explored. Outcome measures were completed at baseline (T0), 6 weeks (T1) and 12 weeks (T2). Data were analysed using mixed-effects linear regression and directed content analysis. One hundred and sixty-three people participated in the trial and 19 in the process evaluation. The intervention was feasible (39 % of eligible patients consented) and acceptable (attrition rate 36 %). There was evidence of higher fatigue self-efficacy at T1 in the intervention group vs comparator (mean difference 0.51 [-0.08 to 1.11]), though the difference in groups decreased by 12 weeks. Time since diagnosis influenced perceived usefulness of the intervention. Modifications were suggested. Proof of concept was achieved. The RESTORE intervention should be subject to a definitive trial with some adjustments. Provision of an effective supportive resource would empower cancer survivors to manage CRF after treatment completion. ISRCTN67521059. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 20% |
| Unknown | 56 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 20% |
| Psychology | 33 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 59 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,828,012
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,879
of 5,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,090
of 397,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#36
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.