↓ Skip to main content

Does Critical Illness Change Levofloxacin Pharmacokinetics?

Overview of attention for article published in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does Critical Illness Change Levofloxacin Pharmacokinetics?
Published in
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2015
DOI 10.1128/aac.02610-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason A. Roberts, Menino Osbert Cotta, Piergiorgio Cojutti, Manuela Lugano, Giorgio Della Rocca, Federico Pea

Abstract

Levofloxacin is commonly used in critically ill patients for which existing data suggests non-standard dosing regimens should be used. The objective of this study was to compare the population pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in critically ill and non-critically ill patients. Adult patients with a clinical indication for levofloxacin were eligible for participation in this prospective pharmacokinetic study. Patients were given 500 mg or 750 mg daily by intravenous administration with up to 11 blood samples taken on day 1 or 2 of therapy. Plasma samples were analysed and population pharmacokinetic analysis undertaken using Pmetrics®. Thirty-five patients (18 critically ill) were included. The mean (SD) age, weight and Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance for the critically ill and non critically ill patients were 60.3 (16.4) and 72.0 (11.6) years, 78.5 (14.8) and 70.9 (15.8) kg and 71.9 (65.8) and 68.2 (30.1) mL/min respectively. A two compartment linear model best described the data. Increasing creatinine clearance was the only covariate associated with increasing drug clearance. The presence of critical illness did not significantly affect any pharmacokinetic parameter. The mean (SD) parameter estimates were clearance 8.66 (3.85) L/h, volume of the central compartment 41.5 (24.5) L, intercompartmental clearance constants from central to peripheral 2.58 (3.51) L/h and peripheral to central compartments 0.90 (0.58) L/h. Monte Carlo dosing simulations demonstrated that achievement of therapeutic exposures was dependent on renal function, pathogen and MIC. Critical illness appears to have no independent effect on levofloxacin pharmacokinetics that cannot be explained by altered renal function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 19 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,621,892
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
#2,794
of 15,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,790
of 396,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
#87
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.