↓ Skip to main content

The validity of optimal leaf traits modelled on environmental conditions

Overview of attention for article published in New Phytologist, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The validity of optimal leaf traits modelled on environmental conditions
Published in
New Phytologist, October 2018
DOI 10.1111/nph.15495
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keith J. Bloomfield, I. Colin Prentice, Lucas A. Cernusak, Derek Eamus, Belinda E. Medlyn, Rizwana Rumman, Ian J. Wright, Matthias M. Boer, Peter Cale, James Cleverly, John J. G. Egerton, David S. Ellsworth, Bradley J. Evans, Lucy S. Hayes, Michael F. Hutchinson, Michael J. Liddell, Craig Macfarlane, Wayne S. Meyer, Henrique F. Togashi, Tim Wardlaw, Lingling Zhu, Owen K. Atkin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 30 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 26 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,785,705
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#3,422
of 8,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,792
of 350,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#85
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.