↓ Skip to main content

Development of an optimal culture system for callogenesis of Chrysanthemum indicum protoplasts

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Development of an optimal culture system for callogenesis of Chrysanthemum indicum protoplasts
Published in
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11738-010-0660-1
Authors

Tom Eeckhaut, Johan Van Huylenbroeck

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,351,847
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
#142
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,943
of 180,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.