| Title |
Increased Morbidity and Mortality in Domestic Animals Eating Dropped and Bitten Fruit in Bangladeshi Villages: Implications for Zoonotic Disease Transmission
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EcoHealth, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10393-015-1080-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John J. Openshaw, Sonia Hegde, Hossain M. S. Sazzad, Salah Uddin Khan, M. Jahangir Hossain, Jonathan H. Epstein, Peter Daszak, Emily S. Gurley, Stephen P. Luby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 63% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,409,480
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#342
of 758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,711
of 402,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.