↓ Skip to main content

A Comparative Assessment of the Aquatic Toxicity of Corexit 9500 to Marine Organisms

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
A Comparative Assessment of the Aquatic Toxicity of Corexit 9500 to Marine Organisms
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00244-018-0568-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. S. Echols, C. J. Langdon, W. A. Stubblefield, G. M. Rand, P. R. Gardinali

Abstract

The use of chemical dispersants during oil spill responses has long been controversial. During the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill, 1.8 million gallons of dispersant, mainly Corexit 9500, were applied in offshore waters to mitigate the human health and coastal environmental impact of surface oil contamination. To evaluate the potential impact of the dispersant on marine life, 18 species, representing important ecological and commercial taxa, were tested using low-energy, dispersant-only water accommodated fractions (WAFs) of Corexit 9500 and standard acute toxicity test methods. All prepared WAFs were analytically characterized. Analyses included the two dispersant markers found in the dispersant and evaluated in samples collected during the DWH Response, dioctylsulfosuccinate sodium salt, and dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether (DPnB). The median lethal and effective concentrations (LC/EC50s) were calculated using a nominal exposure concentration (mg/L, based on the experimental loading rate of 50 mg/L) and measured DPnB (µg/L). Results ranged from 5.50 to > 50 mg/L dispersant and 492 to > 304,000 µg/L DPnB. Species sensitivity distributions of the data demonstrated that taxa were evenly distributed; however, algae and oysters were among the more sensitive organisms. The calculated 5% hazard concentration (HC5) for DPnB (1172 µg/L) was slightly higher than the USEPA chronic criteria of 1000 µg/L and substantially higher than all measured concentrations of DPnB measured in the Gulf of Mexico during the DWH oil spill response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 20 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Chemistry 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 21 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,541,858
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1,565
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,500
of 342,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.