↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Cyclization on Peptide Backbone Dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Chemistry B, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Cyclization on Peptide Backbone Dynamics
Published in
Journal of Physical Chemistry B, December 2015
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b11085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Conan K. Wang, Joakim E. Swedberg, Susan E. Northfield, David J. Craik

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of cyclization as a structure optimization tool in peptide chemistry, little is known about the effect of cyclization on peptide internal dynamics. Here we used a combination of multi-field NMR relaxation and molecular dynamics techniques to study monocyclic as well as polycyclic peptides that have promising biopharmaceutical properties - VH, SFTI-1 and cVc1.1 - and their less constrained analogues to study the effect of backbone cyclization (which forms a macrocycle) and disulfide bond cyclization (which forms internal cycles). We confirmed that backbone cyclization contributes to the rigidity of the monocyclic VH. Interestingly though, backbone cyclization of the bicyclic SFTI-1 had a limited effect on rigidity, with changes in internal dynamics localized around the ligation site. This suggests that the disulfide bond, which creates an internal cycle, has a insulating effect, protecting the internal cycle from external motional effects. An insulating effect was also observed for the polycyclic cVc1.1 - the rigidity of the core was not enhanced by macrocyclization. Additionally, we found that disulfide bonds had a greater contribution to overall rigidity than macrocyclization. Overall, our results suggest that, although backbone cyclization can improve rigidity, there is a complex interplay between dynamics and cyclization, particularly for polycyclic systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 14 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#8,927
of 14,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,721
of 380,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#51
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.