| Title |
SERS based point-of-care detection of food-borne pathogens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microchimica Acta, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00604-015-1698-y |
| Authors |
Nawfal Adam Mungroo, Gustavo Oliveira, Suresh Neethirajan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 22 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 14% |
| Engineering | 13 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,707,325
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#73
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,446
of 390,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.